Word and Spirit part 4- The Sacraments


The Sacraments – the enacted word of God.

The Sacraments are the enacted word and show forth so much of the Biblical story, but many Evangelicals miss the impact of the sacraments because there is little expectation to see the Holy Spirit at work through them. this si such a contrast to the early church, one has only to read the Apostolic Traditions to see that they expected much more than we do. Very often there is some debate about the presence of the Lord in communion but that same discussion is not found in discussions of baptism. We need to see that even in the enacted word the Spirit is very active.

Baptism: Baptism is the gateway to church membership and is thus for believers only. The whole symbolism of baptism shows the wonder of God’s grace and the context of the command to baptize believers in the great commission should give us an expectancy of God’s presence. Yet so often it is seen only as an act of obedience rather than as a place where God meets us through his Spirit. I am not claiming or teaching some form of baptismal regeneration, but rather that we can expect the candidate to be filled with the Holy Spirit as part of the baptismal process. The early Church expected the Holy Spirit to move in power at a baptism, and so should we. Of course the greatest example of one filled with the Spirit at baptism is the Lord Jesus and the accounts in the book of Acts show a similar pattern, should we expect any less than they did?

Communion:When we take the Lord’s Supper we are partaking of the new covenant meal but many of us fail to realize this because of the Zwinglian reduction of the Lord’s Supper to being merely a memorial meal. Yes we are told to remember what Christ has done but surely the communion service is more than this. Nearly every time I conduct a communion service I tell the people that there are three elements of importance to us as we receive the elements,(1) we are to look back and rejoice in what Christ has done for us,(2) we are to look up and receive the promises of God in Christ for today,(3) we are to look forward to the coming of our Lord Jesus in glory. The problem of Zwingli’s view is that it reduces the Lord’s supper to the first aspect alone without doing justice to the fact that through the Holy Spirit we can feed by faith on Christ. The second and third aspects of communion are as vital as the first because we can come to the Table of the Lord with expectancy that we will meet the Lord there through the work of the Holy Spirit. It then becomes a place where the gathered community can expect the Lord to bless, and this is why it is so appropriate to pray for healing at this time when our whole attention is fixed on the finished work of Christ. We need to value the Communion Service more highly and not to just see it as some add-on or something we can while other things are taking place. Recently I have encountered the practice of taking communion during worship (in some charismatic fellowships) without any proper preparation or words of institution, this is to devalue something that Christ has taught us to value.

Let us highly value the two sacraments that Christ has given his church and let us come to both with a greater expectancy that God will move by his Spirit at these times.

Posted in Church, filled with the Spirit, God, grace, Holy communion, Jesus Christ, redemption, the body of Christ., THE CHURCH, the Lord's Supper, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Word and Spirit Part 3


In part 2 I looked briefly at some of the factors affecting the relationship between Word and Spirit in relationship to the inspiration of Holy Scripture. During the debates of the 1970’s I noticed a tendency by some to turn the doctrine of Scripture into an arid intellectual system, this is a problem that one can easily fall into. It is therefore important to look at the relationship of Word and Spirit as this applies to our daily reading of Scripture. The core text for any discussion of inspiration is 2Timothy 3 but so often there is a failure to move onto what Paul is saying Scripture is there for. We need to look briefly at this passage because Paul’s main intention is not to teach a doctrine of inspiration, but shows us how the inspired Word applies to our lives.

2 Timothy 3  14 But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have become convinced of, because you know those from whom you learned it, 15 and how from infancy you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. 16 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.

Notice first the redemptive purpose of Scripture, the Scriptures are given to make us wise for salvation, if we think about this in the context of New Testament teaching we will affirm that we cannot come to know the Saviour without a prior work of the Holy Spirit. we are at once reminded that the Holy Spirit has inspired the word of God so that he can use them to reveal Christ. Without the Holy spirit opening our eyes we would not come to acknowledge the saving grace of God. So at the very outset we can see that Paul’s teaching about scripture contains a dynamic view with regard to the relationship of Word and Spirit. The Spirit uses the Word he has inspired to lead people to the Saviour.

But the passage does not stop there but rather goes onto to show how the Word of God is to be practically applied but again the inspired Word cannot equip us to lead a righteous life or correct us without the working of the Holy Spirit it is therefore vital that we approach the scripture not as a textbook, but as the Word of God in a prayerful manner. We need to grasp the importance of the Holy Spirit’s illumination of the text of Scripture if we are to avoid a sterile intellectualism. We do need to wrestle with the intellectual issues but not because we seek to deal with these as ends in themselves, but rather because we acknowledge that a deeper understanding should lead to a deeper discipleship.

Recently there have been some really helpful studies published which deal with the nature of Scripture among the best is Kevin Vanhoozer’s book, “First Theology” also very helpful on this subject is Michael Horton’s ” The Christian Faith” especially his chapters on the doctrine of revelation.

Posted in Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Word and Spirit Part 2


In my last posting I began to consider some of the implications of the relationship between Word and Spirit, I want to continue with a few insights from the overlap between  the doctrine of the incarnation and that of the inspiration of Scripture. At the outset it should be noted that one can not push this too far as John Webster warns us (Holy Scripture:A Dogmatic Sketch). But on the other hand many authors have drawn on the parallels in a balanced way (see G.C.  Berkouwer: Holy Scripture for example).

From the very beginning of his ministry we see that Jesus the eternal Logos who has taken on human nature is filled with the Holy Spirit. Even in his conception the Holy Spirit is the agent of bringing together of manhood and deity. In all that Jesus is and does as a man he relies on the Holy Spirit to empower him. The question has often been asked how a fallen man can convey God’s word in an infallible way, and this is where the analogy of the incarnation is helpful. The Holy Spirit is able to sanctify his agents in writing Scripture so that the Word that they write is both the word of men and the Word of God. We need to be careful that we do not overdraw the analogy, but because Jesus was a true man  we can see in his life and work an example of how the Holy Spirit works. The Holy Spirit is able therefore to take hold of a man and reveal what God wants said.

The God breathed nature of Holy Scripture demands that we can give some account of the how the Holy Spirit works in humankind.This being so the parallel with how the diverse ways the Holy Spirit works in Jesus becomes important. Jesus was conscious of the empowering of the Holy Spiritand so were the writers of Scripture. Peter says in 2 Peter 1:20-21 “Above all, you must understand that  no prophecy of Scripture came about the prophet’s own interpretation of things. For prophecy never had it origin in the human will, but prophets spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.”

Having said this we must affirm in the strongest possible terms that this is real human writing that reflects the character of the author and his cultural context. Scripture is not a collection of timeless truths but truth revealed through the story of God in space and time. Many attempts have been made to write theology as though it were a rationalistic system rather than seeing the dynamic of God’s relationship with humankind. Therefore to interpret Scripture correctly we need to see what God was saying in the historical context. it as this point that we see the need for a Biblical Theology before we embark on the task of a Systematic Theology.

We need therefore to affirm the close relationship between Word and Spirit both in the life of Jesus and in the biblical text. We need to affirm that the Word of God is brought alive by the Spirit of God because it is the word that he inspired in the first place. The whole tension of Word and Spirit as played out by so many is a false one. Word and Spirit belong together in the life of Christ, the life of the believer and in the pages of Scripture.

Posted in Church, filled with the Spirit, God, God's love, Holy Spirit, Holy Trinity, Jesus Christ, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Word and Spirit Part 1


At the heart of a Trinitarian Theology of revelation is the belief that the Father has supremely revealed himself in Christ Jesus through the power of The Holy Spirit. This means that Holy Scripture is the infallible testimony inspired by the Holy Spirit to this revelation. If this statement is true then the word and spirit relationship not only affects our growth in the Christian Faith,but it also affects our view of the sacraments as the enacted Word of God. Furthermore,the whole question of Revelation also affects our Christology and our view of the relationship between the three persons of the Holy Trinity.

So often the whole of the Word and Spirit tension is reduced to saying like “if you have the Word alone you will dry up, if you have the Spirit alone you will blow up,if you have the Word and Spirit together you will grow up”, this saying is profoundly true, yet it fails to show us how to achieve this.

To grow in the way that the above saying call for is to call for a careful definition of terms, what is the Word of God? or should it be who is the Word of God? We also need to pose questions in the same way about the Holy Spirit.

The Word of God is supremely the  Lord Jesus himself, in John chapter 1 he is called the Logos or Word, it is Jesus who reveals the Father to us through his life and ministry. This is not to ignore the Old Testament but rather to acknowledge that in Christ all Revelation reaches its climax. We only honour the Old testament revelation properly when we see it as part of God’s covenant of Grace with fallen humankind. When we do this and Jesus himself affirms the Divine revelation contained in the Old Testament, we will value the Old Testament highly and see that it has relevance for us today.

We also know that Jesus accomplished his whole mission through the power of the Holy Spirit,here we begin to see that in the person of Jesus there is no tension between Word and Spirit. I know we cannot draw the parallel between Scripture as the Word of God and the Spirit of God ( as the one who inspires and illumines the text) and the incarnation, but there are some interesting areas of overlap.

I want to explore more of this subject in my next blog

Posted in Church, faith, God, grace, Greatness of god, Holy Spirit, Holy Trinity, Jesus Christ, New Testament, redemption, sin, THE CHURCH, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Revival and Theology Part 5- Toward a Biblical Worldview


One of the problems with many revivals is that they only touch a part of life and thus run out of steam, this is because they lack a Biblical Worldview. In this post I want to look at some of the important elements of a Christian worldview.

Christ’s Lordship over all things; The Bible shows us that Jesus Christ is Lord of Lords and King of Kings and that there is no area of life exempt from his Lordship. Jesus is Lord not only of the religious areas of our being but of the whole of life. This can be clearly seen in the practical application given both in the Gospels and in the Letters and also and perhaps more clearly in the book of Revelation.

Creation.The doctrine of creation is vital for a Christian understanding of the world for two reasons,firstly it teaches  us the distinction between the creator and the creation, secondly it shows us that creation is good.
Firstly The Creator-creature distinction, it is vital to maintain that God is transcendent above his creation, he is in no way part of creation. He brought the created word in to being, and he sustains the world moment by moment. Pantheism denies this by seeing the universe as part of God,while Panentheists assert that creation is God’s body neither of which is true to the biblical revelation. it is only as we maintain the Creator-creature distinction that we can see the significant part that each creature has in the plan of God.
Secondly, creation is good when God created the world his verdict was that it was good. Many have tried to teach that the material existence is not good this is the fruit of Greek philosophy and shows a contempt for the physical world. But the scripture affirms both the original creation of matter as good and that the present creation is good but broken,yet it looks forward to a day when all things will be perfected in the new heaven and earth. Our physical bodies are a part of God’s creation and must not be despised but rather taken care of.

Fall; Sadly the Fall brought all sorts of damage into God’s good creation, the world is under God’s curse, and man himself is separated from God. Illness,disease, fatigue and pollution are all results of man’s rebellion against God. Man is broken and harmed in many ways, yet he is created in the image of God. Sometimes theologians talk of humankind being totally depraved, by this they mean that the fall has affected every part of man’s being, they do not mean that every man is as bad as possible.
The fall was something that took place in history that disrupted humankind’s relationship with God and brought about the consequences that we see around us today.

Redemption:  As soon as man fell, God gave a promise of redemption and the whole of the bible shows the outworking of God’s redemptive plan which reaches its culmination in Jesus Christ.
Jesus did not come just to save souls but to remove the curse from creation. The New Testament teaches clearly that Jesus came not only to redeem humankind from sin, but also to liberate the planet from its bondage to the curse. Jesus came to reclaim the universe for the reign of God. Jesus taught us to pray for God’s will to be done on earth as it is in heaven, to pray this prayer is to pray that God will be glorified in the whole of creation and in the whole of our lives.

Consummation: One day Jesus is coming back in glory to complete the work of breaking the curse. I the new heaven and the new earth creation will at last be liberated to its bondage to decay and will enter into what was intended for it from the beginning, creation will fully display the glory of God.
The creation will be beautiful and we will have new bodies and will be made perfect. Sin and all its consequences will have been removed from the whole of creation.
As we wait for that glorious day it is our calling to live for God’s glory and to work to see his kingdom come in some small way in our day. For this task we will need to  fix our eyes on Jesus, to see the wonder of what he has done upon the cross. We will also need to realize that even now God the Father has adopted us into his family. And we will desire to be filled by the Holy Spirit so we can do the Lord’s work in the Lord’s way

Posted in almighty God, body of Christ, Church, creation, culture, faith, Faithfulness, grace, Jesus Christ, Revival, Theology, Word of God, worldview | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Predestination and the Assurance of Faith.


For many the word predestination is a scary word that causes them to doubt the goodness of God but the biblical perspective is entirely different it leads to assurance not fear. the Apostle Paul in Ephesians 1, paints an entirely positive picture.

He says. 3 Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in the heavenly realms with every spiritual blessing in Christ. 4 For he chose us in him before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight. In love 5 he predestined us for adoption to sonship through Jesus Christ, in accordance with his pleasure and will— 6 to the praise of his glorious grace, which he has freely given us in the One he loves. 7 In him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, in accordance with the riches of God’s grace 8 that he lavished on us. With all wisdom and understanding, 9 he made known to us the mystery of his will according to his good pleasure, which he purposed in Christ, 10to be put into effect when the times reach their fulfillment—to bring unity to all things in heaven and on earth under Christ.

11 In him we were also chosen, having been predestined according to the plan of him who works out everything in conformity with the purpose of his will, 12 in order that we, who were the first to put our hope in Christ, might be for the praise of his glory. 13 And you also were included in Christ when you heard the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation. When you believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit, 14 who is a deposit guaranteeing our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God’s possession—to the praise of his glory.

Here,we see that God’s sovereign purpose is the bedrock of the believers assurance, we are chosen before the foundation of the world, this whole concept fills Paul with a spirit of praise and worship because of the amazing grace of God. Paul sees our very adoption of us as children of God as rooted in God’s sovereign grace. However,we may feel if we have been born again we can be sure that God is for us, and nothing shall separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus ( see Romans 8). We can be certain of our salvation because it is all of God, he drew us to himself, he revealed the love of God in Christ Jesus to us and he will hold us to the end.

Problems occur with this glorious doctrine when we try to work out how God works this out. The Arminian view denies God’s sovereign of some to eternal life to try to preserve the free will of man. On the other hand,the Hyper-Calvinist so exalts God’s sovereignty that any freedom in man is denied. The Hyper-Calvinist will not urge the unbeliever to flee to Christ because they feel this is a denial of God’s sovereignty despite what the Scripture says to the contrary. I was raised in the Hyper-Calvinist group known as The Gospel Standard Strict Baptist, their emphasis on God’s sovereignty is tied to an experiential system that creates spiritual bondage because they are always looking for the marks of election. It is sad to see many people being held in a yoke of slavery because they are not told that the mark of election is to believe in the Lord Jesus Christ as Saviour and Lord.

On the Arminian side of the debate there is always the fear of loosing ones salvationand this is equally sad when scripture provides us with a rock of assurance, I have met people whose Christian life is dominated by the fear of loosing one salvation, will the next time they sin cause them to loose salvation? Some Arminians put a greater emphasis on the preserving work of God but still there is a chance that salvation will be lost.

The glory of Paul’s position is that he exalts the glory of God’s grace and power without negating the responsibility of humankind (see Acts 17:16-34 and Romans 1-3). Spurgeon felt that he could evangelize because of the doctrine of election because he knew God would use the preaching of the Gospel to draw sinners to Christ (for more on this see J.I.Packer, Evangelism and The Sovereignty of God).

In conclusion,I would urge my readers to accept the plain meaning of scripture and know that it is the sovereign God that saves you by his grace and being assured of this live a life to the glory of your great Saviour.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Revival And Theology Part 4- The Church of Jesus Christ


In this post we need to look at some of the most vital aspects of the church for a theology of revival.
We need to start by emphasizing that in the Bible the Church is not primarily an institution but an organism. The church is a living body made up of countless people who have each been born again, God in the church has created a new humanity. If we start with the church as an organism we will perceive that God by his Spirit is active through his people. When we look the church primarily as an institution we tend to look at structures and government rather than seeing how God has designed the Church as the body of people that continue the mission of Christ.
The great commission gives us our guiding principle the major role of the church is to make disciples, we are to not only evangelize but we are also to establish people in their faith and equip them to minister to others. This will mean recognizing that all believers have been gifted by the Holy Spirit and helping them to mature in that gifting. A church experiencing revival will need all the gifts of the Holy Spirit to equip it for it’s task. This will also require us to be discerning and test all things by the written word of God, revivals that are not built on the solid foundation of scriptural teaching will soon run out of steam. (see Romans 12 and 1 Corinthians 12 -14)
As the family of God the church has a structure which helps it mature this is why the ministry gifts of the risen Christ are so vital each gift being used to equip the believer. The teacher is important because he can impart the teaching of Scripture with a relevance which will cause believers to grow in their faith.  the Prophet brings the word of God for today as he is directed by the Holy Spirit, the scripture is very clear all prophetic utterances must be tested to see whether they accord with the Word of God. Pastors are vital because they provide care for the flock in spiritual matters and bring wise counsel to individual believers. Evangelists equip the church to reach out to the lost with the good news of Jesus, the evangelist normally has a great compassion for the lost and a God given ability to speak to them in a way that draws them towards the kingdom of God. Alongside these ministries we need the work of the Apostle who leads churches into new territory. (see Ephesians 4)
The church of the New Testament is a living vibrant body, the church today should be the same, we must pray for a fresh outpouring of the Holy spirit on the Church today

Posted in body of Christ, Church, Holy Spirit, Revival, Spiritual gifts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Revival and Theology Part 3


In my first two articles I established the importance for theology in revival for the Church both in Scripture and in Church history. I need to address the question of what sort of theology do we need to aid revival in our day.
God centred. It is vital that our theology starts with right views of God, we must see him in all his glory. I remember Bob Gordon used to say that “all true renewal starts with an Isaiah 6 experience”  he did not mean that we all need to have an identical experience, but rather we see God in all his holy glory and transcendence that causes us to bow in worship.
A God centred Theology will be a thoroughly Trinitarian theology which will acknowledge that the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit all have specific roles to play in the story of redemption and the application of that redemption to humankind. At this point we need to be very careful that we also affirm the unity of the Godhead, if we concentrate on the roles of the economic Trinity too much we can be in danger of falling into tritheism.
In Scripture we see a pattern of the Father planning and initiating salvation, The Son being sent by the Father and carrying out the work of redemption and the Holy Spirit applies that work.
We need as Paul teaches in Ephesians to see the glory of the Father’s plan for us in Christ Jesus; here we see the glorious certainties of divine election which give a bedrock of faith for the believer. Paul in that same letter shows us what Christ has done for us, and all this is linked to the working of the Holy Spirit within our hearts.

Cross Centred. The cross is at the very centre of our thinking because in the cross we see the amazing grace of God. Salvation by grace alone is not just some abstract principle but rather something which honours Christ for what he did upon the cross. As we contemplate the cross we will see that Jesus gained the victory over sin, death and hell, we receive the fruit of this victory as a gift from God. There are so many facets to the work of Christ upon the cross and anyone who wants to understand this better should read John Stott’s book “The Cross of Christ”.

Honouring the Holy Spirit. We need a real openness to all the Scripture teaches about the work of the Holy Spirit. We need to assert in the strongest terms that nobody becomes a Christian without the internal working of the Holy Spirit drawing that person to Christ. It is also the Holy Spirit who reveals the love of God the Father to us, giving us a deep assurance of faith. He dwells within us and we are commanded to be full of the Spirit at all times. but beyond that we need to be open to all the gifts of the Holy Spirit which he has given for the building of the kingdom of God. We need to be open to all the gifts whether it is prophecy or preaching, speaking in tongues or serving. These gifts are to be used under the leadership of the Holy Spirit and always tested by the word of God in scripture.

The importance of the church. We need to see that the church is not just an institution but also a living organism created by God to be his people’s spiritual home. In the book of Acts we are told that when people become believers they are added to the church. The church has a structure but is one that allows the believer to grow in the faith. The church is a place of fellowship where we can look out for one another. It is also the place where God has ordained to carry out his purposes for reaching lost humankind with the gospel. The leadership of the church is there to serve God’s people not to dominate them. According to the Scriptures the leaders should lead but is all for the purpose of seeing the church equipped and edified.
In my next post I will consider some more aspects that we need to emphasize in a Church that is being revived.

Posted in Charismatic, Church, faith, filled with the Spirit, gifts of the Holy Spirit., Holy Spirit, Holy Trinity, Jesus, Jesus Christ, Spiritual gifts, Theology, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Revival and Theology Part 2


In part one I looked at Apostolic Christianity as the grand example of a revival. I showed then the importance of theology for the early church. In this second part I want to demonstrate the continuing  relationship of theology and revival throughout Church history. Obviously in some ways this article will be superficial but my main point is that Revival and Theology walk hand in hand.

The Post Apostolic Church; As the Church grew and people entered it all sorts of baggage from either their heathen past or their Jewish background affected how they interpreted the faith. Into this lively discussion we find leaders like Irenaeus bringing clarity and helping to develop the understanding of both Jesus divine and human natures ( see his “Against Heresies).Other early Church Father such as Tertullian and Justin Martyr. All of the early Theological debates took place in the context of a lively growing Church. The Contributions of great theologian such as Athanasius, Augustine and the Cappadocian all demonstrate the same point. These Church Fathers and others made a vital contribution to the doctrine of the Trinity and to Christology.(for an excellent introduction to the Church Fathers see”Learning Theology With the Church Fathers” by Christopher A Hall).

The Reformation: I know that we could look at examples from the medieval Church, but there is not room in this posting. The Reformation is often seen as the period of doctrinal clarification and seen as an intellectual movement. But this is to miss the point as the Reformation was a time when because Luther’s discovery of a gracious God who justifies the guilty through faith in the finished work of Christ, caused thousand to press into the kingdom of God.
Luther proclaimed the message of salvation by grace not as a doctrinal system but as the way to eternal life, to read his Commentary on Galatians or his Larger Catechism demonstrates this clearly.
As the Reformation spread other leaders took up the challenge to take up the challenge to return to the Theology of the Bible among the greatest was John Calvin.
John Calvin has suffered a bad press down the ages, but one has only to read his letters to see this was a man with a pastoral heart. The same can be said of his “Institutes of The Christian Religion” The intention of his writing this work was to equip believers in their discipleship. He did not think of this as an academic volume of Systematic Theology, but as a volume to be used in conjunction with his commentaries on Holy Scripture. Calvin did help other Pastors like John Knox to  develop his theology, but this was all aimed at the proclamation of the Gospel The reformation period saw many people come to saving faith and must also be therefore classified as a revival.

The Eighteenth Century Revival: When we think of the eighteenth century revival we tend to think of thousands coming into the kingdom and the manifestations that accompanied this but this is only part of the story. All of the Revival Leaders wanted to see people become disciples, and they realised that for this believers needed to be rooted in Biblical doctrine. Wesley developed his class meetings for believers and also published A Christian Library for believers to be able to read abridged and edited versions of Christian Classics. Wesley was well equipped theologically and this can be sen in his writings on Christian Perfection and his notes on the New Testament. One does not have to agree with Wesley to be able to appreciate his use of theology to disciple people. His colleague John Fletcher was also an able theologian but again he used theology to establish believers in their faith. He also used this to defend the distinctive doctrines of the Methodist Movement but again he was concerned with the spiritual development of believers, his work is has distinct pastoral flavour to it.

Jonathan Edwards is remembered for his sermon “Sinners in the hands of an angry God”, but this great pastor also preached on the love of God and for our love for one another, his sermons “charity and its Fruits” show both the pastoral heart and the theological expertise of Jonathan Edwards. Als his work “The Religious Affections” is an amazing combination of pastoral discernment and theological knowledge enabling helping to discern the hand of God in revival and seeing also how the flesh could be manifested in times of renewal. Edwards was able to write at depth as History of Redemption demonstrates or his discussions of free will and divine sovereignty but again his purpose is not to be academic but rather to show that the doctrine was profitable for the believer and for the pastor for their ongoing discipleship.

When we look at these examples it is interesting to note that Wesley and Fletcher were Arminian in their Theology, whereas Edwards was Reformed in his theology, but despite the differences they were united in emphasising the need for good doctrinal for the health of the church.

The Nineteenth Century Revivals: There were various Revival Movements in the Nineteenth Century and it can be said of all of them that theology was important to them. Even very experiential emphases like that of Pheobe Palmer’s take on holiness teaching are rooted in biblical teaching. Palmer saw herself as one who was teaching Wesleyan theology, a careful reading of her works will establish this.
Charles Finney is often used as an example of a revivalist who is technique orientatedbut this is a shallow interpretation of the mature Finney. In any case he tried to develop his thinking from Scripture and expound them. but he also published his Systematic Theology again this is not a book aimed at academics, but rather a volume designed to equip pastors and believers.

C.H Spurgeon, is a great example of a Revival preacher who brought solid doctrinal teaching to his congregation Sunday after Sunday, but this was the truth on fire. Spurgeon took his stand on the Reformed articulation of doctrine. This can be seen in the fact that he used A.AHodge’s  “Outlines of Theology” as his textbook at his Preachers College. He also realised the need for unity in the light of the dangers of Liberal Theology and he was involved in the early developments of The Evangelical Alliance. He was also willing to take a strong stand against liberal theology as his Sermon “A Dirge for the Downgrade” shows. Spurgeon was one who would stand for truth because he was concerned for the health of the church. His program of Church planting also shows his concern for doctrinal clarity, for example the Trust Deed of Shoreham Baptist Church has a clear doctrinal statement ( I use this as an example because I am an elder of this Church.). The Churches that Spurgeon planted were all Particular (Reformed) Baptist Churches.
The Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements: although the early Pentecostal movement was largely experiential, a Wesleyan Theology was assumed in the early days, as people from other backgrounds came into the movement there were different emphases brought into the movement.
One early clash was on the doctrine of sanctification. The Finished Work controversy with W.H.Durham leading those who were opposed to the Wesleyan view of sanctification. It is at this point that we begin to see the early leaders develop a greater theological awareness.
The next controversy to beset was known as the “New Issue” it is here we see the development of Oneness Pentecostalism,in response to this a greater awareness of the need to articulate the doctrine of the Holy Trinity arose. In both of these controversies it was pastoral concerns that caused Pentecostal leaders to articulate a theology for the Growing movement (for some helpful insights on this development see “The Everlasting Gospel” by D. William Faupel).
In recent years we have seen the growth of Pentecostal and Charismatic Theology as can be evidenced by such volumes as Renewal Theology by Rodman Williams, Truth Aflame by Larry Hart and Baptized in the Spirit by Frank Macchia.

Conclusion: in these two postings I have tried to show that Revival and theology are partners together in God’s purpose for the Church we need the vitality of Revival rooted in the roots of Biblical Truth. My hope is that as we seek the Lord to Revive his church again that we will see that The Word and The Spirit go together. Let us pray that will God will revive his Church again and at the same time raise up those who can proclaim the Word of God so that the church resets on God’s solid foundation.

Posted in Arminian, Charismatic, Fletcher, Holy Spirit, Jonathan Edwards, Pentecostal, post Apostolic Church, Reformed, Revival, Spurgeon, The Reformation, Theology, Wesley, Word of God | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Revival and Theology Part 1


pneumaandlogos's avatarPneuma and Logos

We need to ask the question what is the connection between Revival and Theology?  When we talk about revival many people seem to think of revival being on a subjective level and that theology is only for those who are not open to a dynamic relationship with God. On the other hand,many theologians are suspicious of any revival movement because it does not fit it into their neat categories.
It would help if we define Revival, I believe revival is a return to Apostolic Christianity. If that is so then we need to look closely at the book of Acts and the Letters to see what happened. Pentecost is often seen as the example with its signs and wonders but very often the preaching at Pentecost is forgotten. When Peter stands up and preaches he does so to testify to the love and grace of God in Christ. He witnesses…

View original post 227 more words

Posted in Theology | Leave a comment